Animal testing is the only way

The number has been around for most of the last decade. Drug A killed all the rats, mice and dogs.

Animal Testing 101

Instead, all they can do is sit and wait in fear of the next terrifying and painful procedure that will be performed on them. But these are two conceptually different things. Department of Agriculturethere were 71, monkeys in U.

The use of animals in research should evolve out of a strong sense of ethical self-examination. Over half the primates imported between and were handled by Charles River Laboratoriesor by Covancewhich is the single largest importer of primates into the U.

The numbers of rabbits used for this purpose has fallen substantially over the past two decades. Over 20, rabbits were used for animal testing in the UK in In the United States and China, most primates are domestically purpose-bred, whereas in Europe the majority are imported purpose-bred.

We want to teach them to think beyond animal models. They are used as models for human and veterinary diseases in cardiology, endocrinologyand bone and joint studies, research that tends to be highly Animal testing is the only way, according to the Humane Society of the United States.

Here, an animal is treated so that it develops pathology and symptoms that resemble a human disease. To think that human kind sprung off from animals is debatable but undoubtedly true.

It causes death by a concussion to the brain. They languish in pain, suffer from extreme frustration, ache with loneliness, and long to be free.

It states "The ability to experience and respond to pain is widespread in the animal kingdom Animal experiments eliminate some potential drugs as either ineffective or too dangerous to use on human beings. These animals are iconic, rare, and getting rarer all the time, and to see them moving about freely in their native habitat was profoundly moving.

Other approaches Other approaches to animal experiments One writer suggests that we can cut out a lot of philosophising about animal experiments by using this test: Especially when the modes of euthanasia administered include: Some physical methods are only acceptable after the animal is unconscious.

Pithing inserting a tool into the base of the brain is usable on animals already unconscious. Lastly, I appreciate the concession that there are scientific reasons that animal testing should no longer be the status quo.

Which of those drugs should we give to some healthy young human volunteers as the first dose to humans all other things being equal? This would be extremely damaging to the average consumer as So the acts and omissions argument could lead us to say that it is morally worse for the experimenter to harm the animals by experimenting on them than it is to potentially harm some human beings by not doing an experiment that might find a cure for their disease.

Cats are used as a model to develop immunodeficiency virus vaccines and to study leukemia because their natural predisposition to FIV and Feline leukemia virus.

The extent to which animal testing causes pain and sufferingand the capacity of animals to experience and comprehend them, is the subject of much debate. These may involve the use of animal models of diseases or conditions, which are often discovered or generated by pure research programmes.

Switching current animal testing operations to more expensive methods would cause consumer prices on every product that requires testing to rise. The proposals have three aims: Animal experiments and drug safety Scientists say that banning animal experiments would mean either an end to testing new drugs or using human beings for all safety tests Animal experiments are not used to show that drugs are safe and effective in human beings - they cannot do that.

On the subject of analgesics used to relieve pain, the Guide states "The selection of the most appropriate analgesic or anesthetic should reflect professional judgment as to which best meets clinical and humane requirements without compromising the scientific aspects of the research protocol".

Causing unnecessary harm is immoral, but researching diseases on animals is necessary for the good of human kind. This bleak result of deciding the morality of experimenting on animals on the basis of rights is probably why people always justify animal experiments on consequentialist grounds; by showing that the benefits to humanity justify the suffering of the animals involved.

Recommended methods include decapitation beheading for small rodents or rabbits. Armadillos and humans are among only a few animal species that naturally suffer from leprosy ; as the bacteria responsible for this disease cannot yet be grown in culture, armadillos are the primary source of bacilli used in leprosy vaccines.

Periodically, however, a spectacular failure raises new questions about the enterprise—not for ethical reasons, but scientific ones. The harm that will be done to the animals is certain to happen if the experiment is carried out The harm done to human beings by not doing the experiment is unknown because no-one knows how likely the experiment is to succeed or what benefits it might produce if it did succeed So the equation is completely useless as a way of deciding whether it is ethically acceptable to perform an experiment, because until the experiment is carried out, no-one can know the value of the benefit that it produces.Dec 08,  · any benefits to human beings that animal testing does provide could be produced in other ways Animal experiments only benefit human beings if their results are valid and can be applied to.

Animal Testing Is the only Way This Research Paper Animal Testing Is the only Way and other 64,+ term papers, college essay examples and free essays are available now on Autor: review • February 24, • Research Paper • 1, Words (5 Pages) • Views4/4(1). Jan 19,  · Animal Testing That Is Kind, Not Cruel.

“The One Health Company is changing the way that animal testing is done. We’re totally turning it on its head, from something that hurts animals to.

There are many non-animal test methods that can be used in place of animal testing.

Animal testing

Not only are these non-animal tests more humane, they also have the potential to be cheaper, faster, and more relevant to humans.

Animal testing, science, medicine, animal welfare, animal rights, ethics Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, animal research and in vivo testing, is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study.

These new methods for studying human health and medicine not only have the potential to provide better data than that attained through animal testing, they are also a more humane way to practice.

Animal testing is the only way
Rated 0/5 based on 60 review